Seed Thoughts for the Good News Garden
Today I want to address a major barrier to effective
Christian witness in the current social climate. This one may get me in trouble
with some people. Please bear with me.
When faith morphs into a political ideology, we inherently alienate from
the faith those who do not share our political convictions and thus turn them
into “enemies.” Let me explain.
Jesus had the ability to relate to both extremes of
the political ideologies of his day. Simon the Zealot, and Matthew the Roman
collaborator were both apparently able to bury their very real and very intense
political differences to follow Jesus. Jesus was not particularly interested in
which political party came out on top within the Sanhedrin or which Caesar rose
to power in Rome, His kingdom was not of
this world although it IS within us
and AMONG us.
Please
don’t misunderstand me. I am NOT saying that a Christian cannot take a reasoned
political position with core political principles, either conservative or
liberal. What I AM saying is that we must not confuse our political philosophy
with our faith. We are not citizens of
this world … even though we must live, vote and practice citizenship in this
world. We are NOT primarily called to
make converts to our political philosophy or party of choice; we are called to
make disciples of Jesus.
There is abundant evidence
that the aggressive politicization of Evangelical faith and its transformation
into an ideology has greatly hurt the cause of Christian witness. In a 2007 book, unChristian: What a New
Generation Really Thinks about Christianity...and Why It Matters
David Kinnaman uses research data supplied by Barna to show that a huge number
of young adults are leaving churches because of their disgust with the culture
wars and overtly political attitudes in the pulpit.
I
also just finished reading Dave Fitch’s
insightful book The End of Evangelicalism? (2011). In it Fitch shows how Evangelicalism developed a political ideology as a
response to a historical trauma rooted in the conflict between fundamentalists
and liberal modernists in the early part of the 20th century.
The problem with an ideology is that it focuses people’s faith on abstract symbols and
concepts that serve as “master-signifiers” (for a definition, see Slavoj Žižek) rather than on the person of Christ. Another problem with ideology is that it
requires an enemy ... an outsider who is viewed as a threat or a
problem. This creates a huge problem for witness. We cannot incarnate a witness for adversaries! The ministry of reconciliation requires that
we love our enemies and pray for those who spitefully use us. Such a stance of
love is possible with faith, but impossible if one is fighting to win a
political-ideological struggle with enemies.
How can religious ideology be
distinguished from religious faith? Ideology contains certainties; faith
contains mysteries. Ideology promotes militancy; faith promotes humility.
Ideology must be implemented with energetic human force; faith rests in the
providence of God. Ideology produces antagonism between opposing parties; faith
produces love for one’s enemy that bridges ideological divisions.
A sure sign that faith has morphed into political
ideology is when one finds Christians trashing or mocking political figures (or
their families) on a personal basis, or based on their appearance with a thread
of sarcasm. There is nothing wrong with reasoned discourse and disagreement
over principle. In fact, democracy requires it. However when civil discourse
degenerates into demonization of the opposition, you can bet that reasoned
discourse has given way ideological struggle.
I don’t know if I am effectively communicating how
huge a barrier this is to effective Christian witness or how urgent it is that
we address it honestly. I hope you will consider what I am saying. If you
disagree, it’s ok, but please get the two books and read them. Unless
Evangelical Christianity can let go of its aggressive political ideology and
stop trying to rise to a position of social and cultural dominance, and accept
its role as a “suffering servant” to incarnate the love of Christ to a sinful
society, we will never disciple our nation. And what a tragedy that would be.
I asked a young friend of mine, Steve Tamayo, the South Florida
director for Intervarsity Christian Fellowship, to read this newsletter and give
me feedback before I sent it. He gave me permission to include his own story.
…………………………………
Hi Joe,
As far as the idea goes, I totally agree with you. Millennial
young people struggle to have the patience to form political alliances. We tend
to link up with different sides on different issues and to get frustrated with
the whole political power game.
A few years ago, Amy and I were leading a Small Group of
20somethings at a church in Virginia. A guest speaker came in and gave a talk
about how the constitution was inspired by God and public schools were demonic
and we had to be on guard against the gay agenda or we will end up cursed like
Haiti. He ranted and sweated. One by one, our whole Small Group trickled out of
the service. Every single one of those young people left the church. Not just
that church. But church all together. Some, like Amy and me, went back. Some
are following Jesus without the church. Some walked away all together.
This is important stuff you're talking about here.
…………………………………
By-the-way, I am continuing to post selections from
Debbie’s journal online at http://gracerhythmsunforced.blogspot.com/
-- I feel like I am getting to know her in new ways, and her voice is still
speaking to me.
Also, my friend Steve
Tamayo who shared the story above, writes about issue related to mission to millennial
at his blog http://yosteve.blogspot.com.
Thank you!
i think a lot of what's at stake here can be represented in jesus' teaching on power. the rulers of this world lord it over one another, but in the kingdom that's not how power operates. those who would be first must become last. this challenging kingdom inversion of power is not evident in the mainstream u.s. christian church. they are striving for dominance i.e. worldly power.
ReplyDeletebut news flash, if you call out the dominant religious group for being worldly and disgusting they usually do their best to crucify you and hide your body in a cave.
Well stated Joseph. Jesus made all parties nervous at on time or another. His message was totally subversive and apolitical.
ReplyDeletewell, it COULD be argued that his message was very "political" ... just not a political IDEOLOGY. There is a lot more about ideology and how it works that I could not go into in such a brief space. Hi Michael, I agree!
ReplyDelete